LIUNA's Ethics Code
On January 18,1995 LIUNA's General Executive Board charged Arthur A. Coia with the task of drafting an Ethics Code , modeled after the code adopted by the United Automobile Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (the "UAW). In LIUNA's proposal to DOJ that was rejected by Coffey because it did not provide enough judicial oversight and because it joined DOJ as a partner with Arthur Coia in cleaning up corruption in LIUNA, The proposal states DOJ has approved the Ethical practices Code.
The UAW Code of Ethics provides for an oversight board of prominent citizens to hear
LIUNA's Code does not.
UAW Code has "reasonable man provision" ( "knew or should have
LIUNA's code omits this reasonable provision.
In allowing Coia to draft the Ethics Code, everyone concerned was guilty of gross negligence. Why not allow the fox to guard the chicken coup?
LIUNA's General Executive Board adopted an Ethics Code as a constitutional amendment when it did not have a written copy of the Code before it. The final draft of the code wasn't available until February 1995. Whoever heard of any organization adopting constitutional amendments sight unseen? Gross incompetence. Legal malpractice. Pure stupidity.
Coia ommitted the "knew or should have known clause" out of pure self interest because he knew organized crime controlled LIUNA as well as knowing he should have known. Arthur is a member of the "Coif", a group of lawyers admitted to practice before the U.S. Supreme Court. By his own admission, he adopted the Ethics and Disciplinary procedure primarily to ward off an early temporary injunction being granted in the event DOJ filed the RICO complaint as threatened. See Coia testimony in Seripico Disciplinary hearing